Search for Indicators
Demographics Dashboard
The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value; higher than the comparison value; not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; significant change over time; no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period; lower than the previous measurement period; no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Economy
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47361
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47361
45.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47362
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47362
53.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47366
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47366
72.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47368
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47368
55.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47370
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47370
59.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47374
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47374
55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47380
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47380
50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47382
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47382
61.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47384
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47384
55.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47385
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47385
73.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47386
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47386
23.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47387
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47387
63.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47388
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47388
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47390
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47390
51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47392
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47392
39.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47393
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47393
69.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47394
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47394
58.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954000
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954000
44.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954100
54.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954200
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954200
54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954300
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954300
56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954400
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954400
47.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954500
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954500
46.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954600
61.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047960100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047960100
57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969600
55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969700
45.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969800
75.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969900
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969900
51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975500
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975500
44.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975600
41.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975700
55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975800
53.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975900
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975900
57.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976000
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976000
66.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976100
39.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976300
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976300
44.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976400
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976400
57.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976500
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976500
57.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976600
53.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976700
59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976800
66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951400
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951400
56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951500
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951500
57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951600
48.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951700
57.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951800
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951900
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951900
56.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952000
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952000
59.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952100
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960700
59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Union, IN County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960800
68.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Union, IN County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000200
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000200
52.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000400
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000400
50.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000500
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000500
60.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000600
56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000700
67.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000800
56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000900
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000900
49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001000
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001000
59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001100
44.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,506 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,342 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(55.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001101
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001101
39.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001102
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001102
48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010100
54.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010200
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010200
60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010300
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010300
66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010400
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010400
53.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010500
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010500
64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010600
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010600
57.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010700
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010700
65.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010800
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010800
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037500100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037500100
56.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037510100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037510100
55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037520100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037520100
60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037530100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037530100
61.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037540100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037540100
52.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037550100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037550100
54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555000
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555000
47.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,939 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,342 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555001
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555001
51.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555002
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555002
42.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555101
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555101
43.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555102
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555102
64.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560100
55.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,939 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,342 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560101
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560101
57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560102
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560102
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570101
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570101
54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570102
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570102
61.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135400100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135400100
62.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135410100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135410100
57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135420100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135420100
61.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135430100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135430100
58.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135440100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135440100
55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135450100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135450100
54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455001
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455001
57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455002
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455002
54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135460100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135460100
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470101
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470101
63.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470102
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470102
50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135480100
Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135480100
59.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Darke, OH
Total Employment County: Darke, OH
15,127
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15,600)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Fayette, IN
Total Employment County: Fayette, IN
4,698
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5,259)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Franklin, IN
Total Employment County: Franklin, IN
4,705
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5,774)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Henry, IN
Total Employment County: Henry, IN
10,889
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11,113)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Preble, OH
Total Employment County: Preble, OH
10,335
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9,811)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Randolph, IN
Total Employment County: Randolph, IN
5,376
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5,422)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Union, IN
Total Employment County: Union, IN
961
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(963)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment County: Wayne, IN
Total Employment County: Wayne, IN
25,713
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24,866)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Darke, OH
Total Employment Change County: Darke, OH
-3.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Fayette, IN
Total Employment Change County: Fayette, IN
-10.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Franklin, IN
Total Employment Change County: Franklin, IN
-18.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Henry, IN
Total Employment Change County: Henry, IN
-2.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Preble, OH
Total Employment Change County: Preble, OH
5.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Randolph, IN
Total Employment Change County: Randolph, IN
-0.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Union, IN
Total Employment Change County: Union, IN
-0.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Total Employment Change County: Wayne, IN
Total Employment Change County: Wayne, IN
3.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-2.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Transportation
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Darke, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Darke, OH
22.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Fayette, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Fayette, IN
27.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Franklin, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Franklin, IN
34.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Henry, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Henry, IN
25.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Preble, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Preble, OH
25.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Randolph, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Randolph, IN
24.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Union, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Union, IN
26.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Wayne, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work County: Wayne, IN
20.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area
Mean Travel Time to Work Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area
24.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Albany, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Albany, IN
30.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Ansonia, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Ansonia, OH
28.0
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Arcanum, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Arcanum, OH
25.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Batesville, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Batesville, IN
26.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Blountsville, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Blountsville, IN
48.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Boston, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Boston, IN
28.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Bradford, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Bradford, OH
24.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Brookville, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Brookville, IN
28.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
22.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cadiz, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cadiz, IN
47.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
24.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Camden, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Camden, OH
27.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Castine, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Castine, OH
28.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
26.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Centerville, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Centerville, IN
17.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: College Corner, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: College Corner, OH
29.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Connersville, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Connersville, IN
23.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Fayette, IN County Value
(27.7)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dublin, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dublin, IN
21.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dunreith, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dunreith, IN
35.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: East Germantown, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: East Germantown, IN
27.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eaton, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eaton, OH
20.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Economy, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Economy, IN
26.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eldorado, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eldorado, OH
33.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Farmland, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Farmland, IN
22.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Fountain City, IN
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Fountain City, IN
18.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
20.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.