Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Demographics Dashboard

The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.  

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy

Economy

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47361

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47361

45.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47361 has a value of 45.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47361 has a value of 45.1% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47361 has a value of 45.1% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47361 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47362

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47362

53.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47362 has a value of 53.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47362 has a value of 53.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47362 has a value of 53.3% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47362 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47366

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47366

72.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47366 has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47366 has a value of 72.0% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47366 has a value of 72.0% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47368

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47368

55.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47368 has a value of 55.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47368 has a value of 55.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 47368 has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 47368 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47370

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47370

59.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47370 has a value of 59.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47370 has a value of 59.7% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 47370 has a value of 59.7% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47374

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47374

55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47374 has a value of 55.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47374 has a value of 55.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 47374 has a value of 55.4% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 47374 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47380

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47380

50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47380 has a value of 50.5% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47380 has a value of 50.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 47380 has a value of 50.5% which is lower and worse.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 47380 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47382

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47382

61.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47382 has a value of 61.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47382 has a value of 61.1% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 47382 has a value of 61.1% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 47382 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47384

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47384

55.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47384 has a value of 55.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47384 has a value of 55.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47384 has a value of 55.0% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47384 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47385

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47385

73.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47385 has a value of 73.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47385 has a value of 73.5% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47385 has a value of 73.5% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47385 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47386

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47386

23.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47386 has a value of 23.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47386 has a value of 23.8% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47386 has a value of 23.8% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47386 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47387

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47387

63.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47387 has a value of 63.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47387 has a value of 63.6% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47387 has a value of 63.6% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47387 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47388

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47388

48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47388 has a value of 48.2% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47388 has a value of 48.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 47388 has a value of 48.2% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 47388 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47390

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47390

51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47390 has a value of 51.6% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47390 has a value of 51.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 47390 has a value of 51.6% which is lower and worse.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 47390 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47392

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47392

39.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47392 has a value of 39.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47392 has a value of 39.7% which is in the worst 25% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 47392 has a value of 39.7% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47393

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47393

69.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47393 has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47393 has a value of 69.8% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 47393 has a value of 69.8% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 47393 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47394

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 47394

58.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Zip Codes, 47394 has a value of 58.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
IN Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 782 Indiana zip codes.
Compared to U.S. Zip Codes, 47394 has a value of 58.4% which is in the best 50% of zip codes. Zip codes in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.9% while zip codes in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.7%.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 32,897 U.S. zip codes.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 47394 has a value of 58.4% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 47394 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954000

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954000

44.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954000 has a value of 44.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954000 has a value of 44.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954000 has a value of 44.2% which is lower and worse.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954000 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954100

54.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954100 has a value of 54.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954100 has a value of 54.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954100 has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954200

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954200

54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954200 has a value of 54.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954200 has a value of 54.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954200 has a value of 54.3% which is higher and better.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954300

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954300

56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954300 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954300 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954300 has a value of 56.5% which is higher and better.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954300 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954400

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954400

47.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954400 has a value of 47.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954400 has a value of 47.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954400 has a value of 47.2% which is lower and worse.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954500

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954500

46.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954500 has a value of 46.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954500 has a value of 46.6% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954500 has a value of 46.6% which is lower and worse.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18041954600

61.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18041954600 has a value of 61.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18041954600 has a value of 61.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (51.4%), 18041954600 has a value of 61.8% which is higher and better.
Fayette, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Over time, the 18041954600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047960100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047960100

57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18047960100 has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18047960100 has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (57.9%), 18047960100 has a value of 57.1% which is lower and worse.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Over time, the 18047960100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969600

55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18047969600 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18047969600 has a value of 55.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (57.9%), 18047969600 has a value of 55.2% which is lower and worse.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Over time, the 18047969600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969700

45.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18047969700 has a value of 45.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18047969700 has a value of 45.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (57.9%), 18047969700 has a value of 45.5% which is lower and worse.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Over time, the 18047969700 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969800

75.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18047969800 has a value of 75.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18047969800 has a value of 75.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (57.9%), 18047969800 has a value of 75.1% which is higher and better.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Over time, the 18047969800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969900

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18047969900

51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18047969900 has a value of 51.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18047969900 has a value of 51.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (57.9%), 18047969900 has a value of 51.9% which is lower and worse.
Franklin, IN County Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Over time, the 18047969900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975500

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975500

44.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065975500 has a value of 44.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065975500 has a value of 44.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065975500 has a value of 44.5% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065975500 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975600

41.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065975600 has a value of 41.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065975600 has a value of 41.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065975600 has a value of 41.9% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065975600 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975700

55.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065975700 has a value of 55.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065975700 has a value of 55.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065975700 has a value of 55.4% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065975700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975800

53.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065975800 has a value of 53.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065975800 has a value of 53.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065975800 has a value of 53.8% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065975800 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975900

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065975900

57.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065975900 has a value of 57.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065975900 has a value of 57.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065975900 has a value of 57.8% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065975900 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976000

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976000

66.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976000 has a value of 66.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976000 has a value of 66.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976000 has a value of 66.8% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976000 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976100

39.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976100 has a value of 39.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976100 has a value of 39.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976100 has a value of 39.4% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976300

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976300

44.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976300 has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976300 has a value of 44.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976300 has a value of 44.0% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976300 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976400

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976400

57.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976400 has a value of 57.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976400 has a value of 57.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976400 has a value of 57.3% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976400 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976500

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976500

57.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976500 has a value of 57.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976500 has a value of 57.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976500 has a value of 57.7% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976600

53.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976600 has a value of 53.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976600 has a value of 53.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976600 has a value of 53.6% which is lower and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976600 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976700

59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976700 has a value of 59.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976700 has a value of 59.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976700 has a value of 59.2% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976700 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18065976800

66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18065976800 has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18065976800 has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (53.7%), 18065976800 has a value of 66.3% which is higher and better.
Henry, IN County Value
(53.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Over time, the 18065976800 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951400

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951400

56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135951400 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135951400 has a value of 56.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135951400 has a value of 56.5% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135951400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951500

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951500

57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135951500 has a value of 57.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135951500 has a value of 57.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135951500 has a value of 57.6% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135951500 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951600

48.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135951600 has a value of 48.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135951600 has a value of 48.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135951600 has a value of 48.5% which is lower and worse.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135951600 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951700

57.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135951700 has a value of 57.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135951700 has a value of 57.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135951700 has a value of 57.0% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135951700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951800

56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135951800 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135951800 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135951800 has a value of 56.3%.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135951800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951900

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135951900

56.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135951900 has a value of 56.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135951900 has a value of 56.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135951900 has a value of 56.0% which is lower and worse.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135951900 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952000

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952000

59.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135952000 has a value of 59.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135952000 has a value of 59.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135952000 has a value of 59.8% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135952000 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18135952100

58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18135952100 has a value of 58.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18135952100 has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (56.3%), 18135952100 has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Over time, the 18135952100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960700

59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18161960700 has a value of 59.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18161960700 has a value of 59.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Union, IN County Value (62.7%), 18161960700 has a value of 59.6% which is lower and worse.
Union, IN County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
Over time, the 18161960700 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18161960800

68.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18161960800 has a value of 68.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18161960800 has a value of 68.0% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Union, IN County Value (62.7%), 18161960800 has a value of 68.0% which is higher and better.
Union, IN County Value
(62.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
Over time, the 18161960800 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000200

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000200

52.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000200 has a value of 52.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000200 has a value of 52.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000200 has a value of 52.0% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000200 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000400

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000400

50.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000400 has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000400 has a value of 50.0% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000400 has a value of 50.0% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000400 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000500

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000500

60.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000500 has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000500 has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000500 has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000500 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000600

56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000600 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000600 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000600 has a value of 56.7% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000700

67.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000700 has a value of 67.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000700 has a value of 67.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000700 has a value of 67.4% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000800

56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000800 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000800 has a value of 56.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000800 has a value of 56.7% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000900

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177000900

49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177000900 has a value of 49.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177000900 has a value of 49.8% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177000900 has a value of 49.8% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177000900 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001000

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001000

59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177001000 has a value of 59.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177001000 has a value of 59.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177001000 has a value of 59.2% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177001000 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001100

44.7%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177001100 has a value of 44.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.5% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.1%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,506 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177001100 has a value of 44.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,342 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (55.4%), 18177001100 has a value of 44.7% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(55.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177001100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001101

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001101

39.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177001101 has a value of 39.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177001101 has a value of 39.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177001101 has a value of 39.7% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001102

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177001102

48.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177001102 has a value of 48.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177001102 has a value of 48.9% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177001102 has a value of 48.9% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010100

54.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010100 has a value of 54.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010100 has a value of 54.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010100 has a value of 54.2% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010200

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010200

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010200 has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010200 has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010200 has a value of 60.8% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010200 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010300

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010300

66.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010300 has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010300 has a value of 66.3% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010300 has a value of 66.3% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010300 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010400

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010400

53.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010400 has a value of 53.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010400 has a value of 53.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010400 has a value of 53.4% which is lower and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010400 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010500

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010500

64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010500 has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010500 has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010500 has a value of 64.2% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010500 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010600

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010600

57.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010600 has a value of 57.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010600 has a value of 57.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010600 has a value of 57.3% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010600 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010700

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010700

65.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010700 has a value of 65.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010700 has a value of 65.1% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010700 has a value of 65.1% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010700 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010800

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 18177010800

58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Tracts, 18177010800 has a value of 58.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.8% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
IN Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 1,685 Indiana census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 18177010800 has a value of 58.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (56.6%), 18177010800 has a value of 58.7% which is higher and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(56.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Over time, the 18177010800 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037500100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037500100

56.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037500100 has a value of 56.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037500100 has a value of 56.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037500100 has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037500100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037510100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037510100

55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037510100 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037510100 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037510100 has a value of 55.9% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037510100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037520100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037520100

60.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037520100 has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037520100 has a value of 60.8% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037520100 has a value of 60.8% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037520100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037530100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037530100

61.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037530100 has a value of 61.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037530100 has a value of 61.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037530100 has a value of 61.6% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037530100 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037540100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037540100

52.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037540100 has a value of 52.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037540100 has a value of 52.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037540100 has a value of 52.8% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037540100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037550100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037550100

54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037550100 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037550100 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037550100 has a value of 54.4% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037550100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555000

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555000

47.4%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037555000 has a value of 47.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,939 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037555000 has a value of 47.4% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,342 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (57.7%), 39037555000 has a value of 47.4% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037555000 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555001

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555001

51.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037555001 has a value of 51.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037555001 has a value of 51.1% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037555001 has a value of 51.1% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555002

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555002

42.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037555002 has a value of 42.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037555002 has a value of 42.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037555002 has a value of 42.5% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555101

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555101

43.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037555101 has a value of 43.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037555101 has a value of 43.7% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037555101 has a value of 43.7% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037555101 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555102

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037555102

64.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037555102 has a value of 64.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037555102 has a value of 64.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037555102 has a value of 64.7% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037555102 value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560100

55.6%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037560100 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.2%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 2,939 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037560100 has a value of 55.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.7%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 72,342 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (57.7%), 39037560100 has a value of 55.6% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037560100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560101

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560101

57.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037560101 has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037560101 has a value of 57.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037560101 has a value of 57.1% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560102

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037560102

50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037560102 has a value of 50.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037560102 has a value of 50.2% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037560102 has a value of 50.2% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570101

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570101

54.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037570101 has a value of 54.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037570101 has a value of 54.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037570101 has a value of 54.9% which is lower and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037570101 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570102

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39037570102

61.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39037570102 has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39037570102 has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (55.0%), 39037570102 has a value of 61.4% which is higher and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Over time, the 39037570102 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135400100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135400100

62.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135400100 has a value of 62.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135400100 has a value of 62.6% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135400100 has a value of 62.6% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135400100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135410100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135410100

57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135410100 has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135410100 has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135410100 has a value of 57.9% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135410100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135420100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135420100

61.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135420100 has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135420100 has a value of 61.4% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135420100 has a value of 61.4% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135420100 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135430100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135430100

58.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135430100 has a value of 58.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135430100 has a value of 58.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135430100 has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135430100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135440100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135440100

55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135440100 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135440100 has a value of 55.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135440100 has a value of 55.9% which is lower and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135440100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135450100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135450100

54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135450100 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135450100 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135450100 has a value of 54.4% which is lower and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135450100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455001

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455001

57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135455001 has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135455001 has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135455001 has a value of 57.9% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135455001 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455002

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135455002

54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135455002 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135455002 has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135455002 has a value of 54.4% which is lower and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135455002 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135460100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135460100

56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135460100 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135460100 has a value of 56.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135460100 has a value of 56.3% which is lower and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135460100 value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470101

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470101

63.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135470101 has a value of 63.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135470101 has a value of 63.9% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135470101 has a value of 63.9% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135470101 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470102

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135470102

50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135470102 has a value of 50.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135470102 has a value of 50.5% which is in the worst 25% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135470102 has a value of 50.5% which is lower and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135470102 value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135480100

Current Value:

Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Tract: 39135480100

59.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Tracts, 39135480100 has a value of 59.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.6% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
OH Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 3,152 Ohio census tracts.
Compared to U.S. Census Tracts, 39135480100 has a value of 59.7% which is in the best 50% of census tracts. Census tracts in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while census tracts in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.1%.
U.S. Census Tracts
The distribution is based on data from 82,647 U.S. census tracts.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (57.7%), 39135480100 has a value of 59.7% which is higher and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Over time, the 39135480100 value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy

Total Employment

Value
Compared to:

Economy

Total Employment

Value
Compared to:

Total Employment County: Darke, OH

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Darke, OH

15,127
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Darke, OH (15,127) is less  than the previously measured value (15,600).
Prior Value
(15,600)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Darke, OH value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Fayette, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Fayette, IN

4,698
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fayette, IN (4,698) is less  than the previously measured value (5,259).
Prior Value
(5,259)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fayette, IN value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Franklin, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Franklin, IN

4,705
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Franklin, IN (4,705) is less  than the previously measured value (5,774).
Prior Value
(5,774)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Franklin, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Henry, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Henry, IN

10,889
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Henry, IN (10,889) is less  than the previously measured value (11,113).
Prior Value
(11,113)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Henry, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Preble, OH

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Preble, OH

10,335
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Preble, OH (10,335) is greater  than the previously measured value (9,811).
Prior Value
(9,811)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Preble, OH value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Randolph, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Randolph, IN

5,376
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Randolph, IN (5,376) is less  than the previously measured value (5,422).
Prior Value
(5,422)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Randolph, IN value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Union, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Union, IN

961
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Union, IN (961) is less  than the previously measured value (963).
Prior Value
(963)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment County: Wayne, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment County: Wayne, IN

25,713
Paid Employees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Wayne, IN (25,713) is greater  than the previously measured value (24,866).
Prior Value
(24,866)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Wayne, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy

Total Employment Change

Value
Compared to:

Economy

Total Employment Change

Value
Compared to:

Total Employment Change County: Darke, OH

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Darke, OH

-3.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Darke, OH has a value of -3.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Darke, OH has a value of -3.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (2.9%), Darke, OH has a value of -3.0% which is lower and worse.
OH Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Darke, OH has a value of -3.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Darke, OH (-3.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.7%).
Prior Value
(-0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Darke, OH value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Fayette, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Fayette, IN

-10.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Fayette, IN has a value of -10.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.2%.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fayette, IN has a value of -10.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (4.4%), Fayette, IN has a value of -10.7% which is lower and worse.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Fayette, IN has a value of -10.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fayette, IN (-10.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fayette, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Franklin, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Franklin, IN

-18.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Franklin, IN has a value of -18.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.2%.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Franklin, IN has a value of -18.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (4.4%), Franklin, IN has a value of -18.5% which is lower and worse.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Franklin, IN has a value of -18.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Franklin, IN (-18.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-2.4%).
Prior Value
(-2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Franklin, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Henry, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Henry, IN

-2.0%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Henry, IN has a value of -2.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.2%.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Henry, IN has a value of -2.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (4.4%), Henry, IN has a value of -2.0% which is lower and worse.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Henry, IN has a value of -2.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Henry, IN (-2.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-0.8%).
Prior Value
(-0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Henry, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Preble, OH

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Preble, OH

5.3%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Preble, OH has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.0%.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Preble, OH has a value of 5.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (2.9%), Preble, OH has a value of 5.3% which is higher and better.
OH Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Preble, OH has a value of 5.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Preble, OH (5.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Preble, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Randolph, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Randolph, IN

-0.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Randolph, IN has a value of -0.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.2%.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Randolph, IN has a value of -0.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (4.4%), Randolph, IN has a value of -0.8% which is lower and worse.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Randolph, IN has a value of -0.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Randolph, IN (-0.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2.2%).
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Randolph, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Union, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Union, IN

-0.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Union, IN has a value of -0.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.2%.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union, IN has a value of -0.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (4.4%), Union, IN has a value of -0.2% which is lower and worse.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Union, IN has a value of -0.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Union, IN (-0.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-4.8%).
Prior Value
(-4.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Union, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Total Employment Change County: Wayne, IN

Current Value:

Total Employment Change County: Wayne, IN

3.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Wayne, IN has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -0.2%.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Wayne, IN has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (4.4%), Wayne, IN has a value of 3.4% which is lower and worse.
IN Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.8%), Wayne, IN has a value of 3.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Wayne, IN (3.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-2.1%).
Prior Value
(-2.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Wayne, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Transportation

Transportation

Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Darke, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Darke, OH

22.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Darke, OH has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Darke, OH has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Darke, OH has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Darke, OH has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Darke, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Fayette, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Fayette, IN

27.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Fayette, IN has a value of 27.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fayette, IN has a value of 27.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Fayette, IN has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Fayette, IN has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fayette, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Franklin, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Franklin, IN

34.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Franklin, IN has a value of 34.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Franklin, IN has a value of 34.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Franklin, IN has a value of 34.9 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Franklin, IN has a value of 34.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Franklin, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Henry, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Henry, IN

25.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Henry, IN has a value of 25.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Henry, IN has a value of 25.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Henry, IN has a value of 25.8 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Henry, IN has a value of 25.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Henry, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Preble, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Preble, OH

25.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Counties, Preble, OH has a value of 25.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8.
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Preble, OH has a value of 25.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Preble, OH has a value of 25.9 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Preble, OH has a value of 25.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Preble, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Randolph, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Randolph, IN

24.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Randolph, IN has a value of 24.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Randolph, IN has a value of 24.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Randolph, IN has a value of 24.1 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Randolph, IN has a value of 24.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Randolph, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Union, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Union, IN

26.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Union, IN has a value of 26.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Union, IN has a value of 26.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Union, IN has a value of 26.9 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Union, IN has a value of 26.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Union, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Wayne, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Wayne, IN

20.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Counties, Wayne, IN has a value of 20.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3.
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Wayne, IN has a value of 20.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Wayne, IN has a value of 20.1 which is lower and better.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Wayne, IN has a value of 20.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Wayne, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area

24.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of service areas. Service areas in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while service areas in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Reid Health's Service Area has a value of 24.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Reid Health's Service Area value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Albany, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Albany, IN

30.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Albany, IN has a value of 30.3 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Albany, IN has a value of 30.3 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (24.1), Albany, IN has a value of 30.3 which is higher and worse.
Randolph, IN County Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Albany, IN has a value of 30.3 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Albany, IN has a value of 30.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Albany, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Ansonia, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Ansonia, OH

28.0
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Ansonia, OH has a value of 28.0 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Ansonia, OH has a value of 28.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (22.3), Ansonia, OH has a value of 28.0 which is higher and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Ansonia, OH has a value of 28.0 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Ansonia, OH has a value of 28.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Ansonia, OH value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Arcanum, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Arcanum, OH

25.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Arcanum, OH has a value of 25.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Arcanum, OH has a value of 25.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (22.3), Arcanum, OH has a value of 25.6 which is higher and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Arcanum, OH has a value of 25.6 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Arcanum, OH has a value of 25.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Arcanum, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Batesville, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Batesville, IN

26.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Batesville, IN has a value of 26.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Batesville, IN has a value of 26.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (34.9), Batesville, IN has a value of 26.2 which is lower and better.
Franklin, IN County Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Batesville, IN has a value of 26.2 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Batesville, IN has a value of 26.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Batesville, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Blountsville, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Blountsville, IN

48.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Blountsville, IN has a value of 48.9 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Blountsville, IN has a value of 48.9 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (25.8), Blountsville, IN has a value of 48.9 which is higher and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Blountsville, IN has a value of 48.9 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Blountsville, IN has a value of 48.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Blountsville, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Boston, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Boston, IN

28.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Boston, IN has a value of 28.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Boston, IN has a value of 28.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), Boston, IN has a value of 28.8 which is higher and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Boston, IN has a value of 28.8 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Boston, IN has a value of 28.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Boston, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Bradford, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Bradford, OH

24.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Bradford, OH has a value of 24.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Bradford, OH has a value of 24.2 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (22.3), Bradford, OH has a value of 24.2 which is higher and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Bradford, OH has a value of 24.2 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Bradford, OH has a value of 24.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Bradford, OH value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Brookville, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Brookville, IN

28.4
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Brookville, IN has a value of 28.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Brookville, IN has a value of 28.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (34.9), Brookville, IN has a value of 28.4 which is lower and better.
Franklin, IN County Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Brookville, IN has a value of 28.4 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Brookville, IN has a value of 28.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Brookville, IN value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Burkettsville, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Burkettsville, OH

22.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Burkettsville, OH has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Burkettsville, OH has a value of 22.3 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (22.3), Burkettsville, OH has a value of 22.3.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Burkettsville, OH has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Burkettsville, OH has a value of 22.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Burkettsville, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cadiz, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cadiz, IN

47.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Cadiz, IN has a value of 47.3 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cadiz, IN has a value of 47.3 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (25.8), Cadiz, IN has a value of 47.3 which is higher and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Cadiz, IN has a value of 47.3 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Cadiz, IN has a value of 47.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cadiz, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cambridge City, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cambridge City, IN

24.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Cambridge City, IN has a value of 24.1 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cambridge City, IN has a value of 24.1 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), Cambridge City, IN has a value of 24.1 which is higher and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Cambridge City, IN has a value of 24.1 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Cambridge City, IN has a value of 24.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cambridge City, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Camden, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Camden, OH

27.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Camden, OH has a value of 27.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Camden, OH has a value of 27.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (25.9), Camden, OH has a value of 27.2 which is higher and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Camden, OH has a value of 27.2 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Camden, OH has a value of 27.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Camden, OH value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Castine, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Castine, OH

28.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Castine, OH has a value of 28.6 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Castine, OH has a value of 28.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (22.3), Castine, OH has a value of 28.6 which is higher and worse.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Castine, OH has a value of 28.6 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Castine, OH has a value of 28.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Castine, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN

26.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Cedar Grove, IN has a value of 26.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Cedar Grove, IN has a value of 26.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Franklin, IN County Value (34.9), Cedar Grove, IN has a value of 26.2 which is lower and better.
Franklin, IN County Value
(34.9)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Cedar Grove, IN has a value of 26.2 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Cedar Grove, IN has a value of 26.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Cedar Grove, IN value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Centerville, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Centerville, IN

17.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Centerville, IN has a value of 17.6 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Centerville, IN has a value of 17.6 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), Centerville, IN has a value of 17.6 which is lower and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Centerville, IN has a value of 17.6 which is lower and better.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Centerville, IN has a value of 17.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Centerville, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: College Corner, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: College Corner, OH

29.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, College Corner, OH has a value of 29.8 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, College Corner, OH has a value of 29.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (25.9), College Corner, OH has a value of 29.8 which is higher and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), College Corner, OH has a value of 29.8 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), College Corner, OH has a value of 29.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the College Corner, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Connersville, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Connersville, IN

23.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Connersville, IN has a value of 23.8 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Connersville, IN has a value of 23.8 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Fayette, IN County Value (27.7), Connersville, IN has a value of 23.8 which is lower and better.
Fayette, IN County Value
(27.7)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Connersville, IN has a value of 23.8 which is lower and better.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Connersville, IN has a value of 23.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Connersville, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dublin, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dublin, IN

21.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Dublin, IN has a value of 21.7 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dublin, IN has a value of 21.7 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), Dublin, IN has a value of 21.7 which is higher and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Dublin, IN has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Dublin, IN has a value of 21.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dublin, IN value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dunreith, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Dunreith, IN

35.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Dunreith, IN has a value of 35.2 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Dunreith, IN has a value of 35.2 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Henry, IN County Value (25.8), Dunreith, IN has a value of 35.2 which is higher and worse.
Henry, IN County Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Dunreith, IN has a value of 35.2 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Dunreith, IN has a value of 35.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Dunreith, IN value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: East Germantown, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: East Germantown, IN

27.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, East Germantown, IN has a value of 27.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, East Germantown, IN has a value of 27.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), East Germantown, IN has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), East Germantown, IN has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), East Germantown, IN has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the East Germantown, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eaton, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eaton, OH

20.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Eaton, OH has a value of 20.7 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Eaton, OH has a value of 20.7 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (25.9), Eaton, OH has a value of 20.7 which is lower and better.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Eaton, OH has a value of 20.7 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Eaton, OH has a value of 20.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Eaton, OH value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Economy, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Economy, IN

26.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Economy, IN has a value of 26.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Economy, IN has a value of 26.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), Economy, IN has a value of 26.1 which is higher and worse.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Economy, IN has a value of 26.1 which is higher and worse.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Economy, IN has a value of 26.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Economy, IN value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eldorado, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Eldorado, OH

33.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Eldorado, OH has a value of 33.6 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Eldorado, OH has a value of 33.6 which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Preble, OH County Value (25.9), Eldorado, OH has a value of 33.6 which is higher and worse.
Preble, OH County Value
(25.9)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Eldorado, OH has a value of 33.6 which is higher and worse.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Eldorado, OH has a value of 33.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Eldorado, OH value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Farmland, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Farmland, IN

22.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Farmland, IN has a value of 22.6 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Farmland, IN has a value of 22.6 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Randolph, IN County Value (24.1), Farmland, IN has a value of 22.6 which is lower and better.
Randolph, IN County Value
(24.1)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Farmland, IN has a value of 22.6 which is lower and better.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Farmland, IN has a value of 22.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Farmland, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Fountain City, IN

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Fountain City, IN

18.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to IN Census Places, Fountain City, IN has a value of 18.6 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.2.
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 633 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Fountain City, IN has a value of 18.6 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Wayne, IN County Value (20.1), Fountain City, IN has a value of 18.6 which is lower and better.
Wayne, IN County Value
(20.1)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Compared to the IN Value (24.0), Fountain City, IN has a value of 18.6 which is lower and better.
IN Value
(24.0)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Fountain City, IN has a value of 18.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fountain City, IN value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Gettysburg, OH

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Census Place: Gettysburg, OH

20.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OH Census Places, Gettysburg, OH has a value of 20.7 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.6.
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,145 locales.
Compared to U.S. Census Places, Gettysburg, OH has a value of 20.7 which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.9 while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.0.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 26,325 U.S. Census Places.
Compared to the Darke, OH County Value (22.3), Gettysburg, OH has a value of 20.7 which is lower and better.
Darke, OH County Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Compared to the OH Value (23.6), Gettysburg, OH has a value of 20.7 which is lower and better.
OH Value
(23.6)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Gettysburg, OH has a value of 20.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Gettysburg, OH value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.