Search for Indicators
Demographics Dashboard
The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010200
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010200
15.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010300
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010300
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010400
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010400
16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010500
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010500
11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010600
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010600
17.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010700
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010700
9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010800
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 18177010800
18.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037500100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037500100
11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037510100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037510100
14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037520100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037520100
12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037530100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037530100
7.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037540100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037540100
12.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037550100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037550100
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555000
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555000
19.0%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555001
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555001
16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555002
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555002
16.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555101
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555101
19.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555102
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037555102
21.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037560100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037560100
13.5%
(2015-2019)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037560101
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037560101
13.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037560102
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037560102
19.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037570101
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037570101
10.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037570102
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39037570102
11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135400100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135400100
17.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135410100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135410100
16.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135420100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135420100
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135430100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135430100
9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135440100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135440100
12.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135450100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135450100
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135455001
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135455001
18.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135455002
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135455002
16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135460100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135460100
16.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135470101
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135470101
9.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135470102
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135470102
16.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135480100
Persons with a Disability Census Tract: 39135480100
21.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Persons with Health Insurance County: Darke, OH
Persons with Health Insurance County: Darke, OH
92.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Fayette, IN
Persons with Health Insurance County: Fayette, IN
92.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Franklin, IN
Persons with Health Insurance County: Franklin, IN
92.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(92.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Henry, IN
Persons with Health Insurance County: Henry, IN
92.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(92.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Preble, OH
Persons with Health Insurance County: Preble, OH
94.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
Prior Value
(92.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Randolph, IN
Persons with Health Insurance County: Randolph, IN
91.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Union, IN
Persons with Health Insurance County: Union, IN
91.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Persons with Health Insurance County: Wayne, IN
Persons with Health Insurance County: Wayne, IN
91.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
Prior Value
(91.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Economy
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Darke, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Darke, OH
60.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Fayette, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Fayette, IN
54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Franklin, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Franklin, IN
63.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Henry, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Henry, IN
51.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Preble, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Preble, OH
60.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Counties
The distribution is based on data from 88 Ohio counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Randolph, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Randolph, IN
56.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Union, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Union, IN
62.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Wayne, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force County: Wayne, IN
57.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Indiana counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Service Area: Reid Health's Service Area
57.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Albany, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Albany, IN
49.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Ansonia, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Ansonia, OH
65.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Arcanum, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Arcanum, OH
59.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Batesville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Batesville, IN
67.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Blountsville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Blountsville, IN
40.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Boston, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Boston, IN
61.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Bradford, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Bradford, OH
65.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Brookville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Brookville, IN
58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
75.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Cadiz, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Cadiz, IN
73.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
63.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Camden, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Camden, OH
41.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Castine, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Castine, OH
57.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
68.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Centerville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Centerville, IN
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: College Corner, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: College Corner, OH
54.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Connersville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Connersville, IN
53.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Fayette, IN County Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Dublin, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Dublin, IN
52.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Dunreith, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Dunreith, IN
56.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: East Germantown, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: East Germantown, IN
57.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Eaton, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Eaton, OH
60.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Economy, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Economy, IN
61.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Eldorado, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Eldorado, OH
68.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Farmland, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Farmland, IN
57.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Fountain City, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Fountain City, IN
64.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Glenwood, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Glenwood, IN
71.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Fayette, IN County Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Gordon, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Gordon, OH
60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Gratis, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Gratis, OH
59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
70.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Greensboro, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Greensboro, IN
35.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Greenville, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Greenville, OH
53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Hagerstown, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Hagerstown, IN
60.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Hollansburg, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Hollansburg, OH
66.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Ithaca, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Ithaca, OH
73.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Kennard, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Kennard, IN
59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Knightstown, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Knightstown, IN
58.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lake Lakengren, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lake Lakengren, OH
67.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lake Santee, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lake Santee, IN
74.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Laurel, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Laurel, IN
50.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
64.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lewisville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lewisville, IN
52.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Liberty, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Liberty, IN
62.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Union, IN County Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Losantville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Losantville, IN
61.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lynn, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Lynn, IN
52.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Metamora, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Metamora, IN
25.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Middletown, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Middletown, IN
52.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Milton, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Milton, IN
68.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Modoc, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Modoc, IN
55.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mooreland, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mooreland, IN
62.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
68.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
71.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
47.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Castle, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Castle, IN
53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Madison, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Madison, OH
51.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Paris, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Paris, OH
51.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Trenton, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Trenton, IN
62.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Weston, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: New Weston, OH
52.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: North Star, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: North Star, OH
66.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
60.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Franklin, IN County Value
(63.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Osgood, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Osgood, OH
70.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Palestine, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Palestine, OH
73.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Parker City, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Parker City, IN
55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
65.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Richmond, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Richmond, IN
54.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
54.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Rossburg, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Rossburg, OH
59.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Saratoga, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Saratoga, IN
50.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Shirley, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Shirley, IN
61.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Spiceland, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Spiceland, IN
64.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
46.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Springport, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Springport, IN
46.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Straughn, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Straughn, IN
69.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
48.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Henry, IN County Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Union City, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Union City, IN
51.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Union City, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Union City, OH
52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Verona, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Verona, OH
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Versailles, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Versailles, OH
64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
59.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
62.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West College Corner, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West College Corner, IN
75.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Union, IN County Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West Elkton, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West Elkton, OH
62.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West Manchester, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: West Manchester, OH
70.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Whitewater, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Whitewater, IN
56.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Wayne, IN County Value
(57.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Winchester, IN
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Winchester, IN
54.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
IN Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 675 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Randolph, IN County Value
(56.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
75.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 1,211 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 28,884 U.S. Census Places.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(59.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45003
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45003
61.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45070
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45070
62.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45303
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45303
68.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45304
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45304
65.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45308
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45308
66.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45310
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45310
75.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Mercer, OH County Value
(66.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Mercer County value.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45311
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45311
55.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45320
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45320
61.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45321
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45321
59.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45328
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45328
56.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45330
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45330
55.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Preble, OH County Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45331
Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force Zip Code: 45331
55.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OH Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 1,233 Ohio zip codes.
U.S. Zip Codes
The distribution is based on data from 33,056 U.S. zip codes.
Darke, OH County Value
(60.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
