Search for Indicators
Demographics Dashboard
The demographic dashboard includes basic demographic information about your community covering topics like population, education and poverty. This dashboard is modeled after the US Census Bureau QuickFacts demographic profile. To learn more about this page, please visit our help center.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Age and Sex
Female Population Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
Female Population Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
62.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Springport, IN
Female Population Census Place: Springport, IN
56.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Straughn, IN
Female Population Census Place: Straughn, IN
48.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
Female Population Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Union City, IN
Female Population Census Place: Union City, IN
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Union City, OH
Female Population Census Place: Union City, OH
49.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Verona, OH
Female Population Census Place: Verona, OH
41.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Versailles, OH
Female Population Census Place: Versailles, OH
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
Female Population Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
49.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
Female Population Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
51.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West College Corner, IN
Female Population Census Place: West College Corner, IN
58.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(50.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West Elkton, OH
Female Population Census Place: West Elkton, OH
40.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: West Manchester, OH
Female Population Census Place: West Manchester, OH
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(50.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Whitewater, IN
Female Population Census Place: Whitewater, IN
33.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(51.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Winchester, IN
Female Population Census Place: Winchester, IN
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Female Population Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
Female Population Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
41.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(50.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Darke, OH
Male Population County: Darke, OH
49.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OH Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Fayette, IN
Male Population County: Fayette, IN
49.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Franklin, IN
Male Population County: Franklin, IN
49.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Henry, IN
Male Population County: Henry, IN
52.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Preble, OH
Male Population County: Preble, OH
50.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OH Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Randolph, IN
Male Population County: Randolph, IN
50.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Union, IN
Male Population County: Union, IN
49.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(49.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population County: Wayne, IN
Male Population County: Wayne, IN
48.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Albany, IN
Male Population Census Place: Albany, IN
43.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Ansonia, OH
Male Population Census Place: Ansonia, OH
47.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Arcanum, OH
Male Population Census Place: Arcanum, OH
47.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Batesville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Batesville, IN
49.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Blountsville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Blountsville, IN
53.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Boston, IN
Male Population Census Place: Boston, IN
34.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Bradford, OH
Male Population Census Place: Bradford, OH
52.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Brookville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Brookville, IN
48.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
Male Population Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
56.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Cadiz, IN
Male Population Census Place: Cadiz, IN
56.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
Male Population Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
48.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Camden, OH
Male Population Census Place: Camden, OH
55.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Castine, OH
Male Population Census Place: Castine, OH
44.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
Male Population Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
51.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Centerville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Centerville, IN
50.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: College Corner, OH
Male Population Census Place: College Corner, OH
39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Connersville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Connersville, IN
47.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Fayette, IN County Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Dublin, IN
Male Population Census Place: Dublin, IN
53.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Dunreith, IN
Male Population Census Place: Dunreith, IN
47.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: East Germantown, IN
Male Population Census Place: East Germantown, IN
51.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Eaton, OH
Male Population Census Place: Eaton, OH
45.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Economy, IN
Male Population Census Place: Economy, IN
51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Eldorado, OH
Male Population Census Place: Eldorado, OH
49.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Farmland, IN
Male Population Census Place: Farmland, IN
46.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Fountain City, IN
Male Population Census Place: Fountain City, IN
48.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
Male Population Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
49.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Glenwood, IN
Male Population Census Place: Glenwood, IN
52.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Fayette, IN County Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Gordon, OH
Male Population Census Place: Gordon, OH
51.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Gratis, OH
Male Population Census Place: Gratis, OH
54.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
Male Population Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Greensboro, IN
Male Population Census Place: Greensboro, IN
53.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Greenville, OH
Male Population Census Place: Greenville, OH
46.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Hagerstown, IN
Male Population Census Place: Hagerstown, IN
51.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Hollansburg, OH
Male Population Census Place: Hollansburg, OH
49.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Ithaca, OH
Male Population Census Place: Ithaca, OH
62.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Kennard, IN
Male Population Census Place: Kennard, IN
47.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Knightstown, IN
Male Population Census Place: Knightstown, IN
53.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Lake Lakengren, OH
Male Population Census Place: Lake Lakengren, OH
53.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Lake Santee, IN
Male Population Census Place: Lake Santee, IN
52.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Laurel, IN
Male Population Census Place: Laurel, IN
39.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
Male Population Census Place: Lewisburg, OH
49.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Lewisville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Lewisville, IN
49.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Liberty, IN
Male Population Census Place: Liberty, IN
49.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Losantville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Losantville, IN
39.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Lynn, IN
Male Population Census Place: Lynn, IN
43.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Metamora, IN
Male Population Census Place: Metamora, IN
46.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Middletown, IN
Male Population Census Place: Middletown, IN
48.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Milton, IN
Male Population Census Place: Milton, IN
44.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Modoc, IN
Male Population Census Place: Modoc, IN
56.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Mooreland, IN
Male Population Census Place: Mooreland, IN
40.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
Male Population Census Place: Mount Auburn, IN
50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
Male Population Census Place: Mount Carmel, IN
45.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
Male Population Census Place: Mount Summit, IN
47.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: New Castle, IN
Male Population Census Place: New Castle, IN
51.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: New Madison, OH
Male Population Census Place: New Madison, OH
48.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: New Paris, OH
Male Population Census Place: New Paris, OH
50.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: New Trenton, IN
Male Population Census Place: New Trenton, IN
40.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: New Weston, OH
Male Population Census Place: New Weston, OH
47.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: North Star, OH
Male Population Census Place: North Star, OH
51.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
Male Population Census Place: Oldenburg, IN
37.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Osgood, OH
Male Population Census Place: Osgood, OH
57.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Palestine, OH
Male Population Census Place: Palestine, OH
41.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Parker City, IN
Male Population Census Place: Parker City, IN
45.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
Male Population Census Place: Pitsburg, OH
52.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Richmond, IN
Male Population Census Place: Richmond, IN
47.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
Male Population Census Place: Ridgeville, IN
51.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Rossburg, OH
Male Population Census Place: Rossburg, OH
40.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Saratoga, IN
Male Population Census Place: Saratoga, IN
51.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Shirley, IN
Male Population Census Place: Shirley, IN
50.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Spiceland, IN
Male Population Census Place: Spiceland, IN
49.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
Male Population Census Place: Spring Grove, IN
37.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Springport, IN
Male Population Census Place: Springport, IN
43.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Straughn, IN
Male Population Census Place: Straughn, IN
51.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
Male Population Census Place: Sulphur Springs, IN
52.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(52.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Union City, IN
Male Population Census Place: Union City, IN
51.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Union City, OH
Male Population Census Place: Union City, OH
50.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Verona, OH
Male Population Census Place: Verona, OH
58.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Versailles, OH
Male Population Census Place: Versailles, OH
49.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
Male Population Census Place: Wayne Lakes, OH
51.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
Male Population Census Place: West Alexandria, OH
48.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: West College Corner, IN
Male Population Census Place: West College Corner, IN
41.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Union, IN County Value
(49.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Union County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: West Elkton, OH
Male Population Census Place: West Elkton, OH
59.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: West Manchester, OH
Male Population Census Place: West Manchester, OH
51.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(49.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Whitewater, IN
Male Population Census Place: Whitewater, IN
66.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(48.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Winchester, IN
Male Population Census Place: Winchester, IN
49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Male Population Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
Male Population Census Place: Yorkshire, OH
58.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(50.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(49.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Race and Hispanic Origin
Population White County: Darke, OH
Population White County: Darke, OH
96.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OH Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Fayette, IN
Population White County: Fayette, IN
96.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Franklin, IN
Population White County: Franklin, IN
97.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(97.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Henry, IN
Population White County: Henry, IN
94.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(94.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Preble, OH
Population White County: Preble, OH
96.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OH Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Randolph, IN
Population White County: Randolph, IN
96.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Union, IN
Population White County: Union, IN
96.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(96.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White County: Wayne, IN
Population White County: Wayne, IN
89.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
IN Value
(83.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(89.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Albany, IN
Population White Census Place: Albany, IN
95.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Ansonia, OH
Population White Census Place: Ansonia, OH
99.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Arcanum, OH
Population White Census Place: Arcanum, OH
95.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Batesville, IN
Population White Census Place: Batesville, IN
92.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(96.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Blountsville, IN
Population White Census Place: Blountsville, IN
87.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(93.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Boston, IN
Population White Census Place: Boston, IN
96.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Bradford, OH
Population White Census Place: Bradford, OH
97.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Brookville, IN
Population White Census Place: Brookville, IN
97.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(96.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
Population White Census Place: Burkettsville, OH
99.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Cadiz, IN
Population White Census Place: Cadiz, IN
94.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(93.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
Population White Census Place: Cambridge City, IN
97.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Camden, OH
Population White Census Place: Camden, OH
98.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Castine, OH
Population White Census Place: Castine, OH
93.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
Population White Census Place: Cedar Grove, IN
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Franklin, IN County Value
(96.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Franklin County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Centerville, IN
Population White Census Place: Centerville, IN
91.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: College Corner, OH
Population White Census Place: College Corner, OH
88.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Connersville, IN
Population White Census Place: Connersville, IN
92.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Fayette, IN County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Dublin, IN
Population White Census Place: Dublin, IN
99.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Dunreith, IN
Population White Census Place: Dunreith, IN
99.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(93.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: East Germantown, IN
Population White Census Place: East Germantown, IN
99.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Eaton, OH
Population White Census Place: Eaton, OH
94.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Economy, IN
Population White Census Place: Economy, IN
97.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Eldorado, OH
Population White Census Place: Eldorado, OH
94.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Farmland, IN
Population White Census Place: Farmland, IN
96.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Randolph, IN County Value
(92.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Randolph County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Fountain City, IN
Population White Census Place: Fountain City, IN
98.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
Population White Census Place: Gettysburg, OH
98.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Glenwood, IN
Population White Census Place: Glenwood, IN
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Fayette, IN County Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Fayette County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Gordon, OH
Population White Census Place: Gordon, OH
98.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Gratis, OH
Population White Census Place: Gratis, OH
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Preble, OH County Value
(95.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Preble County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
Population White Census Place: Greens Fork, IN
93.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Wayne, IN County Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Wayne County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Greensboro, IN
Population White Census Place: Greensboro, IN
100.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Henry, IN County Value
(93.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Henry County value.
IN Value
(80.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Indiana State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Population White Census Place: Greenville, OH
Population White Census Place: Greenville, OH
95.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Darke, OH County Value
(96.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Darke County value.
OH Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Ohio State value.
US Value
(65.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
